Monday, May 9, 2011

Essay 4


Readerly, Writerly Me.


     Writing is the process of putting words down on paper, developing an expression in print. Writing can come from the heart, the brain and the soul. It is a gift that some people will never be able to obtain. It is taking the thoughts from your head and planting them down on a sheet of paper. To many, the pen is considered mightier than the sword. Written expression enhances your power and ability for self-expression. One can envision the writer’s feelings through their own perception allowing for creative indulgence.
Why do I write? I write because I want to and I have to. When I want to write, it is usually about an interest or something personal. I let my mind go blank and my heart pulsate the ideas through my veins and out my fingertips. Expression is not thought; it’s exuded from the soul. It is then, that I am not trying to please anyone. I know that I can write anything I want, and not worry about being a disappointment or worrying about a grade. It is my way of expressing my feelings in which cannot be said aloud. Maybe the words are hurtful, shy, or maybe I just cannot find the ways to say them in person. What do the words mean? Only I will know the true meaning, therefore it is up to the reader to try and gain an understanding, Thus being the readers responsibility. I’m the one putting them on paper, mashing them together like cake batter. Therefore it is up to the reader to understand my uncooked cake.
      I may not be much of a writer, but I do write. Writing is a profession, whereas reading is a skill. The reader must obtain the ability to translate the words expressed by a stranger, and incorporate an understanding. Emotions can be encoded and translated by an individual through writing. To be able to express love, hate and passion at its maximum intensity is by far a gift that no one is truly worthy of. If the reader can be captivated and deeply involved in the writer’s vision, at that point the writer is proven worthy of their gift.
A little advice for future writers, life is short. Appreciate everything and everyone you have in your life. Don’t live in the past, instead live in the present and prepare for the future, for everyday is a new day. Make sure you love and cherish everyone you have in your life; you do not know when they will be gone. “I hate to think of the morning, when I will wake up to find you gone” (Collins)
Advice for my reader…Follow the trail of my words and let them guide you to a euphoric state of mind and lose yourself in my thoughts. Let the strength of my words shake the ground underneath you till it splits and let yourself fall into my world. Release your beliefs and believe in me so my words can be your livelihood.



















Works Cited:

Billy Collins- The Flight of the Reader (Poem)

Friday, May 6, 2011

what is happening to writing???




               What is happening to writing?
              

When we consider the materiality or immateriality of print books vs. digital books, we reach certain conclusions about how writing is changing in this digital, hypertextual, hypermedia age.  Jay David Bolter and his book Writing Space does an interesting job examining the structural and historical shift occurring in this “late age of print.” Bolter discusses the changes in writing and digital media, its history, and predictions of its future.
There are several aspects of new and existing media that is changing. In addition, writing as a print and as a technology itself is also continuing to change. Jay David Bolter is the author of a book titled Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print. Being a writer himself, Bolter is extremely caught up in the fact that technology has taken such a drastic turn in society. With his smug attitude, he thinks that there is no future for printed text. Printed text will always find its way in the world. It will always be necessary and convenient in some way. It may not be so religious to have books printed on paper anymore, but printed text will find its own way to be important and of such value. Technology may be blooming to be a sense of life, but no matter who you are, printed text will be a reminder of where we came from and will be valued for all eternity. Like I have said in my online blog, technology is just a simpler and easier way for people to get things done. It shows how lazy a society we have become. Bolter is thinking from a writer’s point of view, so he seems somewhat let down with how far we have come from the printing press, and how printed text was so valued in the past. Where as now technology is overtaking that value printed text once possessed. It will always find its way in society no matter how far technology grows. Bolter is too negative and pessimistic for me. I can understand where he's coming from, I just feel he can go a different way about it.
To some, a picture can be worth a thousand words. Giving a different meaning than words on a blank page. Adding texture, color, shape, and the ability to have an imagination. Images have come a long way throughout history.  Whether they’re digital, in a frame, or on a canvas they provide viewers with a feeling rather than a definition. Although, when reading written text, some develop a sense of imagination to go along with the words. Like a picture drawn in their imagination. Ekphrasis is the graphic, often dramatic description of a visual work of art. In ancient times it referred to a description of any thing, person, or experience. The goal of this literary form is to make the reader envision the object described as if it were a physically present object.  In many cases, however, the object never actually existed, making the description somewhat of a demonstration of both the creative imagination and the skills the writer has.
Technology has given individuals the opportunity to view historical pieces of art on the Internet, if the inability to view it in person gets in the way. In my own personal opinion, I feel it should be viewed in person, but the default option is the next best opportunity.  Most novels don’t come with images. Therefore, Digital media is the next best thing in line. As Bolter states, "Digital media claims to achieve greater immediacy and authenticity by integrating images, verbal text constrains the images on the printed page." (pg.47) In addition, a large variety of novels have been made into films, and still continuing to today. Showing that difference to viewers, between reading and thinking, and viewing, imagining, and believing. Similar to the saying, “Seeing is believing”. “The relationship between popular films and novels is further proof that the visual is now regarded as primary...in the case that novels were made into films" (Bolter pg.56)
Many forms of printed text are now using modes of textual and visual representation. An example is a graph used in USA Today presented in Writing Space. Showing how images have made their way into simple graphs to give deeper meaning to what is being presented. This example is a graph used in the text on page 53, demonstrating men shaving. Instead of a standard bar graph, razors are illustrated as the standardly used bars, giving the reader a deeper understanding. “The shaving man himself also has no function in the graph. His presence transforms the graph into a picture…” (Bolter pg.53) Thus showing how visual images have now added representation into statistical forms.
I am not much of a reader. When I read, I tend to get lost in the words and my mind travels somewhere else. I am a very visual person. I am more capable of remembering something that is visual, rather than something read.
Our true history is in the hands of printed text. If it wasn’t for printed text we would have no proof of our worlds past, where we came from, and what we have accomplished to get where we are today. For example, ancient manuscripts and the bible, both telling us how our world has come to be.  BUT when you think about it, what did we do when words didn’t exist? In ancient times, cavemen used hieroglyphics to illustrate the world around them, whether it be animals, weather and climate changes, or even life and death. Both Printed text and visual texts play a huge role in our worlds communication. We depend and rely on them greatly, whereas without them, there would be hardly any communication. No matter the degree at which technology is progressing, I feel that printed text will always serve just as much of a purpose to us, in one way or another. "Print today is continuing to remake itself in order to maintain its claim to represent reality as effectively as digital and other visual technology" (Bolter pg.47)
I may not be much of a reader but I definitely respect printed text. There are texts that have made it hundreds of years and still exist today. For example, the Declaration of Independence and the Diary of Anne Frank. Both in which are irreplaceable and forever recognizable pieces of the past and present.  The declaration represents the United States and where it stands today. The Diary of Anne Frank reminds us of the struggles we once faced and are currently facing today, through the eyes of an innocent little girl. Both powerful printed texts that survived through war. These printed treasures are teaching us that history can provide a message that is still relevant to today.
No matter the distance in differences between visual and printed text, they do at times come together as one. As Bolter expresses, "Text is by no means absent from digital media"(pg72) To view digital media, it is a fact, that the first process you have to take is type words, followed by reading words to get where you need to go. Regardless of the pictures and graphics that may surround them. Therefore, printed and visual media joins together. When we consider the materiality or immateriality of print books vs. digital books, we certainly can reach conclusions about how writing is changing. Jay David Bolter and his novel Writing Space does an interesting job examining the historical and structural shift occurring in this “late age of print.”








Works Cited:


Bolter, J. David. Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext, and
the Remediation of Print. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001. Print.

Friday, April 15, 2011

Chapter 6: Refashioned dialogues


Chapter 6: Refashioned dialogues

Observe:
-Reading music=Reading books
-A reader that can read something in their head and not physically interpret it as in reading it aloud, like playing it in music
-Writing and reading are not always sequential, can be but not always.
Newspapers, encyclopedias, papyrus
-Greeks- reading doesn’t always have to be left to right
Electronic writing is not sequential
-Bolter- writing text is better/ oral text is better
Plato vs. Socrates
“…Dissatisfactions with linear argument…”
I really liked the second YouTube video. How what we say can be interpreted in different ways, if we just rearrange what we say and how we say.


Infer:
-Writing and reading are not always sequential, can be but not always.
Newspapers, encyclopedias, papyrus
-Greeks- reading doesn’t always have to be left to right
Electronic writing is not sequential
-A reader that can read something in their head and not physically interpret it as in reading it aloud, like playing it in music
- With written text, readers have the ability to go back and stop reading, to think about what was just read
Socrates was known for his verbal/oral texts, how he spoke in person
Blogs as an example/ own electronic space. Discussing class topics, in class, at home, on our phones anywhere.

Questions:

What do you think about writing and reading being sequential? Do you agree with Bolter’s thoughts?

Is written text better, or is oral text better? To you and to society?

Why do you think Bolter was so against Socrates informal (linear) way of writing?

How you feel spoken words have changed through dialogue, in electronic and written?

Do you think these changes in “refashioned dialogue” are for the better?

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

The Breakout of the Visual

Our Prezi !!!


http://prezi.com/ghoczegwblcq/the-breakout-of-the-visual/

BLIND SCREEN/WANDERING EYES


Definitely not fun typing without being able to see the screen!!!

Who’s the story teller in your family? Relate a story frequently told. How has that person/story influenced you?

The storyteller of my family is my grandpa. At 90 years old, he has the most insightful and yet inspirational stories I have ever heard. During family gatherings, everyone huddles around him, quiet as a mouse and listens to what he has to say. Listening to that thick and heavy accent recalling the last 90 years of his life and past experiences. His comedic fashion of language cannot be dismissed. He interprets humor into every story, gaining everyone’s interest that much more. My grandpa is one of the most important people in my life. Sharing the same birthday, and blowing out the same candles for 22 years, he is a major part of my life. At the age he is, he has come so far, through thick and thin. Coming all the way from Poland, being a spy for the English army, having a fur business in NYC, to being an amazing father, husband and grandfather. Through all of his accomplishments and triumphs, he still walks this earth telling stories for those to listen. His intelligence is beyond others, and his will to live thus far is astonishing.
He has influenced me and continues to everyday. He gives me the drive to overcome any obstacles that come in my way. Giving me the strength to yearn success like he has. Without him, I wouldn’t be the same. I see so much of him in me that will live on forever. 

Chapter 5 = The Electronic Book


2. Chapter 5 = The Electronic Book

Observe: I like the style, how it was structured and organized.
I know understand the papyrus roll and a codex. Where they come from. What they entail. There overall purpose back in the day.
I like the comparison, on how we are now going back to the scroll with computers, how we scroll down the screen rather than turn the page as in a book.
I like the video about opposing eBooks. Taking away the new book smell, the feeling of the plastic, rather than paper and leather.
I like the information given about Encyclopedias. (Britannica)
I think that the idea of digital libraries are convenient for some people that don’t have time to step foot in the door of an actual library, but yet it takes away the point in history where the public can go into an actual historical building enclosed with hand drawn books.

Infer:
We are now going back to the idea of the scroll. As in computers, scrolling down the screen to see more information rather than the standard turning of a page as if in a book, or codex of some sort.
eBooks- can be somewhat authentic, going back to the original.
The eBook is more complete, immediate and authentic. Bolter opposes the idea of the eBook.
YouTube video- Doesn’t like eBooks.
Encyclopedia- Bench mark, summary, public can gain all the information in one book. It is Alphabetized.
Digital libraries, you can find the same book on different shelves or under different subjects.

Questions:
How do you feel about eBooks?

Do you find Encyclopedia’s useful and convenient?

Is an online encyclopedia easier than the formal book version?

Do you think the idea of “digital libraries” take away from the physical aspect of libraries?

Do you think that Bolter needs to get it out of his head, that technology is taking over the aspect of written, handheld books.

Chapter 3 = Hypertext and the Remediation of Print


1. Chapter 3 = Hypertext and the Remediation of Print

Observe:
     The layout and the information where there from the chapter. The only thing was structuring it. I feel that the video about hyperlinking was displayed way too early in the presentation.
-video about hyperlinking.
-Could have been a bit more creative about sources/pictures
- I think, computers are more likely to make mistakes.
-“Hypertext makes everything easier” (Nel)
- “Connecting to your previous point” (Nel) – that’s why it’s a path
-Graphics with text (Alex)
- I disagree with the quote about how hypertext illustrates our thoughts and mind. Computers cant express emotion, therefore, it cannot associate with our “minds”
-Hypertext can be controlling. They limit your choices of where you can go further. Providing you with a link, with no choice


Infer:
- Main points, hypertext is easier, it provides “wider spectrum of information” “books are more specific on one topic” Hypertext can offer a different page” (Cassandra)
- “Hypertext makes everything easier” (Nel)
- “Connecting to your previous point” (Nel) – that’s why it’s a path
- Every hypertext page is different, can have different mediums
- Hypertext can be difficult, has negatives and positives
- One point, You have control and a choice, delusion
- Another point, you don’t have a choice, no control

Question:
What made you choose that video?

To you, What makes hypertext better than print?

What made you choose the game “Telephone” as your interpretation of speech?

What made you choose these specific quotes from the chapter?

Where these quotes meant to prove just your point when there
are many points trying to be made in the chapter?

You play a video about hypertext and how fast it is, and how you cant stop, to later saying that it limits your ability to look up, which do you agree with?

For you Nel: 
My purple feather is weighing down your horse